![]() ![]() If someone gets me and my phone, and forces the use of my fingerprint, they can unlock my phone, and now they can get into my Enpass database. But ENPASS is making those risks far worse than they need to be, and far worse than they are simply with the other PIN approach, it's crazy. Of course, having fingerprint access is a user's choice and if they make that choice they need to know the risks involved. being forced to open the database with your fingerprint. an inconsistent methodology of security so users cannot expect the same level of security. My concern is not a brute force attack or someone trying to add a new fingerprint. There is no reason it should work EXACTLY the same way with the finger print. If you force close the app or reboot the phone, you don't get a chance to enter your PIN first, you MUST enter your Master Password. If the PIN is wrong EVEN ONCE, it forces you to use the Master Password. This is exactly what you do with the PIN method. ONLY AFTER that has happened, should Fingerprint support be available. ![]() ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS require the typed Master Password for the initial load of the database (after the phone boots up, or after the app is opened from being force closed, whatever). On the other hand, if we delete the encrypted master password entirely on fingerprint authentication error (which sometimes happens with genuine users also for various reasons), it will lead to enable fingerprint support again from the Enpass settings and hence user inconvenience without any gain in Kumar I am certainly not one of your programmers, but from a logic point of view, it's very clear to me what the solution is. Even if someone knows your device code and tries to add a new fingerprint, Android will invalidate the Enpass fingerprint key immediately and master password will be asked next time. In other words brute-forcing by Fingerprint is almost impossible. ![]() Nobody can enter inside Enpass without your fingerprint. Unlocking by fingerprint is securely implemented in android OS and OS itself restricts a users after n number of bad tries. In December 2018, Enpass 6 was released with additional features including multiple vaults and the ability to generate time-based one-time passwords for online services.Firstly let me assure you this is not a security bug. Besides pin and master password, it has the functionality of unlocking the app using biometric authentication. It features its own integrated software keyboard for form filling on Android devices. It features cross browser platform support and form filling for all supported platforms. It features cloud synchronization of the keychain via Google Drive, Box, Dropbox, OneDrive, iCloud and self-hosted WebDAV solutions such as ownCloud and Nextcloud. The application features client-side encryption, using SQLCipher to encrypt its keychain file locally with a user-defined master password. ![]() In November 2017, developers stopped issuing updates on the BlackBerry platform and in December 2018, with the launch of v6, the company dropped support for Windows 10 Mobile. The desktop version, however, is unlimited. The mobile version is restricted to storing only 25 passwords free of charge, although more functionality is available for a price. Users can choose to synchronize their data between different devices using their own preferred cloud storage service like Google Drive, Box, Dropbox, OneDrive, iCloud, and WebDAV. The app does not store user data on its servers, but locally on their own devices, encrypted. Windows, macOS, Linux, ChromeOS, iOS, Android,Įnpass is a cross-platform offline password management app available as a freemium software with subscription plans as also with one time payment licence. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |